tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7076784298036657874.post7821404314738501969..comments2023-12-29T02:42:29.917-06:00Comments on Next Year Country: Opinions Divided on Climate Change and CCS in SaskatchewanNext Year Countryhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08057931166900219143noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7076784298036657874.post-73306753850175713602012-07-17T04:52:14.534-06:002012-07-17T04:52:14.534-06:00Asking IPAC-CO2 to explain the benefits is like as...Asking IPAC-CO2 to explain the benefits is like asking IPCC to explain climate change. Or Exxon and Peabody Coal. Too much vested interest to believe any of them.The Blog Fodderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11441978691701289074noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7076784298036657874.post-48119001563312146902012-07-16T20:25:19.579-06:002012-07-16T20:25:19.579-06:00CCS is expensive BS that cannot possibly work on a...CCS is expensive BS that cannot possibly work on a scale that would make a difference. Will all that CO2 remain underground for thousands of years or find a fault to move through? Are old oil fields full of holes the place to store CO2? What affect could fracking have? Why produce so much CO2 in the first place when we could have community owned renewable energy in sunny, windy Sask.?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com